Re: Pixel compo !? Eh ..
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Gathering ] [ FAQ ]
Posted by ScaraB on February 07, 1998 at 22:52:13:
In Reply to: Re: Pixel compo !? Eh .. posted by java on February 05, 1998 at 14:28:21:
: : Hmm.. I wonder why you call it "pixel" compo anyway... : : What about photoshop-pictures??(or similar) they aren't : : pixeled, but neither raytraced... so they go in the pixel : : compo.. couldn't you have split the compos into one : : "clean pixeling" compo, and one "computer generated" : : compo.. in the last both raytraced and photoshop-pics get... : : Maybe this split will be more fair because both : : renderers and photoshop users have advantages the : : pixelers don't,... : : What about that?? : I agree. There should be three gfx compos. : One raytrace, one Pixel (max 640x512x256) and : one "all gfx compo" where all the photoshop : pics and OTHER gfx contribs can enter. : I mean .. art is not ONLY pixel and Raytrace, : nowadays scene gfxers do collages of pictures : and stuff like that. : / avaj Yeah! Bright idea! Letts All Have Seperat Compos, And We Can All Win! Go sit on a Landmine, Java!
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Gathering ] [ FAQ ]
|