Re: 5 minutes in multi-ch. compo

Posted by Bjørn Nyland on January 26, 1998 at 19:11:13:

In Reply to: Re: 5 minutes in multi-ch. compo posted by Phoenix[Hornet/DC5] on January 20, 1998 at 20:32:49:

: : 4 minutes is too short.
: : We neeeeed 5.

: Very few people want to sit through 5 times X minutes
: of poor 'music'. I've found that I often lose
: interest in most tunes (including my own) after
: 3 minutes. 4 is just fine by me. If you can't
: fit a tune in 4 minutes and under 1 meg, then you're just not trying hard enough.
I agree.
If you can't stand the heat,
get out of the kitchen!
5 minutes - too much, 3 minutes - not enough.
4 minutes - OK!
I don't think that it's a good idea to torture the jury with 200 modules whith a lenght of 5 minutes.
They're just humans.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Comments: : : : : 4 minutes is too short. : : : We neeeeed 5. : : Very few people want to sit through 5 times X minutes : : of poor 'music'. I've found that I often lose : : interest in most tunes (including my own) after : : 3 minutes. 4 is just fine by me. If you can't : : fit a tune in 4 minutes and under 1 meg, then you're just not trying hard enough. : I agree. : If you can't stand the heat, : get out of the kitchen! : 5 minutes - too much, 3 minutes - not enough. : 4 minutes - OK! : I don't think that it's a good idea to torture the jury with 200 modules whith a lenght of 5 minutes. : They're just humans. Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: